Skip to main content
· 12/26/2002

Peters v. Gunnell, Inc

Citations

  • 655 N.W.2d 582
  • 253 Mich. App. 211

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • quotation marks and citation omitted; alteration in original; emphasis added
  • in which this Court denied the plaintiff attorney fees under the sales representative commissions act because the act defined a “prevailing party” as one “who wins all the allegations of the complaint or on all of the responses to the complaint”
  • quotation marks and citation omitted; alteration in original; emphasis added
  • “Jurisdictional allegations are not viewed in hindsight.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Zahra, Cavanagh, White

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.