· 12/23/2011
PETERS, LUCIOUS, PEOPLE v
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reviewing \judge's finding that there was no prima facie showing of a discriminatory pattern for an abuse of discretion\
- Commonwealth's reason for challenge that \juror did not seem 45 intelligent\ was \insufficient in these circumstances\ to overcome other considerations in first step of Batson-Soares analysis
- judge should have inquired about prosecutor's reasons for peremptory challenge where \[t]he record offers little insight into what potential neutral reason the Commonwealth might have offered\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.