Peter Ventura v. Attorney General, State of Florid

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering the conclusions of law articulated in decisions cited by a state court in its own opinion
• considering the conclusions of law articulated in decisions cited by a state court in its own opinion
• considering the conclusions of law articulated in decisions cited by a state court in its own opinion
• explaining Giglio error occurs when “undisclosed evidence demonstrates that the prosecution’s case included perjured testi- mony” (emphasis added) (citation omitted)
• analyzing a Giglio claim under § 2254(d) and stating “whether the state court reached a conclusion of law that contradicts one reached by the Supreme Court-requires a careful analysis of the Florida Supreme Court’s decision”
• Giglio materiality depends on, among other things, “the importance of the testimony of the falsely testifying witness to the government’s case”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).