Peter v. State, Department of Health & Social Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that U.S. Bancorp “clarified that not all moot claims require vacatur”
• finding equity requires vacatur of challenged order when prevailing party's unilateral actions below resulted in issue becoming moot
• discussing other cases where court held issue was not moot based on potential collateral consequences
• discussing other cases where court held issue was not moot based on potential collateral consequences
• finding equity requires vacatur of challenged order when prevailing party's unilateral actions below resulted in issue becoming moot
• finding equity requires vacatur of challenged order when prevailing party’s unilateral actions below resulted in issue becoming moot

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).