PETER SPOREA v. REGIONS BANK, N.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a finding against injured worker on sole proximate cause issue in a nonsubscri-ber case would have prevented recovery
• in non-subscriber case, finding against injured worker on sole proximate cause issue would have prevented recovery
• in non-subscriber case, finding against injured worker on sole proximate cause issue would have prevented recovery
• in non-subscriber case, finding against injured worker on sole proximate cause issue would have prevented recovery
• in non-subscriber case, finding against injured worker on sole proximate cause issue would have prevented recovery
• in non-subscriber case, finding against injured worker on sole proximate cause issue would have prevented recovery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).