Peter Scalamandre & Sons, Inc. v. Kaufman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “insufficient evidence” supported the jury’s finding of actual malice and thus, “the district court erred in entering judgment for [the plaintiff] on its defamation claims”
• fact that an expert holds a belief does not foreclose debate on that belief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).