Skip to main content
· 8/15/1996

Peter S. Helland v. South Bend Community School Corporation

Citations

  • 93 F.3d 327
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 20560
  • 68 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,201
  • 71 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1621

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Because a Title VII claim requires intentional discrimina- tion, the pretext inquiry focuses on whether the employer’s stated reason was honest, not whether it was accurate.”
  • describing termination for proselytizing as a “legitimate nondiscriminatory reason! ]”
  • “[T]the pretext inquiry focuses on whether the employer’s stated reason was honest, not whether it was accurate. ‘Pretext means a lie, specifically a phony reason for some action.’” (ellipses omitted) (quoting Russell v. Acme-Evans Co., 51 F.3d 64, 68 (7th Cir. 1995)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Rovner, Wood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.