· 8/15/1996
Peter S. Helland v. South Bend Community School Corporation
Citations
- 93 F.3d 327
- 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 20560
- 68 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,201
- 71 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1621
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Because a Title VII claim requires intentional discrimina- tion, the pretext inquiry focuses on whether the employer’s stated reason was honest, not whether it was accurate.”
- describing termination for proselytizing as a “legitimate nondiscriminatory reason! ]”
- “[T]the pretext inquiry focuses on whether the employer’s stated reason was honest, not whether it was accurate. ‘Pretext means a lie, specifically a phony reason for some action.’” (ellipses omitted) (quoting Russell v. Acme-Evans Co., 51 F.3d 64, 68 (7th Cir. 1995)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bauer, Rovner, Wood
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.