Peter R. Perez v. Edward Sifel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[Bjecause appellant could renew these claims [barred by Heck] if he ever succeeds in overturning his conviction, dismissal without prejudice is appropriate.”
• “A cause of action under § 1983 for an improper arrest or search accrues at the time of the arrest or search.”
• Heck bars § 1983 action alleging conspiracy to procure conviction through perjury, falsifying evidence, and withholding exculpatory evidence
• dismissal of Nec/c-barred claims is without prejudice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).