Peter N. Georgiades v. Helen Martin-Trigona, Anthony R. Martin-Trigona, Peter N. Georgiades v. Helen Martin-Trigona

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a mother cannot choose to have her non-attorney son represent her in court
• holding that non-attorney could “appear pro se but [was] not qualified to appear . . . as counsel for others”
• holding that individual who is “not a member of the bar of any court . . . may appear pro se but is not qualified to appear in the District Court . . . as counsel for others”
• observing that a pro se litigant “is not qualified to appear in the District Court . . . as counsel for others
• stating that an individual “not a member of the bar of any court . . . may appear pro se but is not qualified to appear in . . . court as counsel for others”
• applying federal law to conclude that the defendant's son, who was not a lawyer, could not be admitted to represent the defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).