Peter M. Roberts, Cross-Appellee v. Sears, Roebuck and Company, a Corporation, Cross-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Lear does not bar a plaintiffs recovery where “[t]here is no balance of equities between [defendant/licensee] and plaintiff in their contractual relations”
• plaintiff can seek return of fraudulently obtained patent and profits lost in past from defendant's wrongful use of patent
• federal law should be applied when policy underlying the state rule is merely procedural
• Rules of Decision Act is not limited to diversity cases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).