Peter J. WRENN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMERICAN CAST IRON PIPE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that presenting right-to-sue letter and requesting appointment of counsel satisfies 90-day limitation period
• holding that presenting right-to-sue letter and requesting appointment of counsel satisfies 90-day limitation period
• holding, following Parissi , that payment of the filing fee did not determine the complaint's timeliness for purposes of the statute of limitations
• holding, following Parissi, that payment of the filing fee did not determine the complaint’s timeliness for purposes of the statute of limitations
• comparing cases in which dismissal was inappropriate with cases in which it was appropriate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).