Skip to main content
· 5/15/1998

Peter J. Hartmann Co. v. Capital Bank and Trust Co.

Citations

  • 694 N.E.2d 1108
  • 296 Ill. App. 3d 593
  • 230 Ill. Dec. 830

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that any duties of a subcontractor to a property owner were merely \incidental to [the subcontractor's] contractual duty\
  • finding that any duties of a subcontractor to a property owner were merely \incidental to [the subcontractor's] contractual duty\
  • extending Consumer Fraud Act protections to transaction between two commercial parties
  • extending Consumer Fraud Act protections to transaction between two commercial parties
  • “(1) the commission of a deceptive act or practice; (2) intent on defendants’ part that plaintiff rely on the deception; and (3) ... the deception occurred in the course of conduct involving trade or commerce.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hartman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.