Skip to main content
· 4/22/1983

Peter J. Coruzzi v. State of New Jersey, Administrative Office of the State of New Jersey

Citations

  • 705 F.2d 688
  • 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 28612

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the plaintiff judge could have appealed an order of the New Jersey Supreme Court suspending his pay to that court
  • reasoning that “New Jersey’s interests in assuring the ethical conduct of its judges and in maintaining the integrity of its judiciary are . . . significant”
  • \The Younger abstention doctrine rests on the strong federal policy on noninterference with pending state judicial proceedings.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Seitz, Higgin-Botham, Sloviter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.