· 4/22/1983
Peter J. Coruzzi v. State of New Jersey, Administrative Office of the State of New Jersey
Citations
- 705 F.2d 688
- 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 28612
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the plaintiff judge could have appealed an order of the New Jersey Supreme Court suspending his pay to that court
- reasoning that “New Jersey’s interests in assuring the ethical conduct of its judges and in maintaining the integrity of its judiciary are . . . significant”
- \The Younger abstention doctrine rests on the strong federal policy on noninterference with pending state judicial proceedings.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Seitz, Higgin-Botham, Sloviter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.