Peter I. Diamondstone v. Christopher A. MacAluso Leroy Prior, David R. Stanton, A. James Walton, Jr., and State of Vermont

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recusal is not required for “remote, contingent, indirect or speculative interests” (quoting United States v. 76 F.3d 442, 451 (2d Cir. 1996))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).