Skip to main content
· 4/1/1971

Peter H. Clark Lodge No. 483 v. Industrial Commission

Citations

  • 268 N.E.2d 382
  • 48 Ill. 2d 64
  • 1971 Ill. LEXIS 367

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • because “the record clearly reflected] that the receipt for costs was not exhibited within the statutory period and [because] this requirement could not be waived, we must hold that the circuit court had no jurisdiction”
  • because “the record clearly reflect[ed] that the receipt for costs was not exhibited within the statutory period and [because] this requirement could not be waived, we must hold that the circuit court had no jurisdiction”
  • no receipt of payment produced and exhibited
  • no receipt of payment produced and exhibited
  • no receipt of payment produced and exhibited

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ward

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.