Peter Christopher Grigg v. Tiffaney Danielle Grigg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that recusal was not necessary where the district court referred to the Government’s actions as “absurd” and “asinine”
• judge’s views on legal issues may not 3 serve as basis for motions to disqualify
• “[T]he court’s commentary on his role as ‘represent[ing] the community’ and that the community was ‘tired’ of armed robbery and guns does not demonstrate the kind of ‘truly extreme’ remarks that are required for recusal.” (second alteration in original)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).