Peter C. BRACHTEL, Appellant, v. Kenneth S. APFEL, Commissioner of Social Security Commission, Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a hypothetical restriction including “scantly more” than the Newton hypothetical sufficiently described deficiencies of concentration, persistence, or pace
• holding that hypothetical including “scantly more” than Newton hypothetical was adequate
• holding that hypothetical including “scantly more” than Newton hypothetical was adequate
• holding that even a limitation including “scantily more” than that in Newton, such as work “which does not require close attention to detail” and excluding “work[ing] at more than a regular pace,” sufficiently described deficiencies of concentration, persistence, or pace
• finding sufficient a hypothetical that included “scantly more than what was included in the Newton hypothetical”
• finding sufficient a hypothetical that included “scantly more than what was included in the Newton hypothetical”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).