Skip to main content
· 11/30/2016

Peter Bormuth v. Grand River Environmental Action Team

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “there is a general presumption that the court will relinquish supplemental jurisdiction and dismiss the state-law claims without prejudice.”
  • “there is a general presumption that the court will relinquish supplemental jurisdiction and dismiss the state-law claims without prejudice.”’
  • “there is a general presumption that the court will relinquish supplemental jurisdiction and dismiss the state-law claims without prejudice.”
  • employees lacked standing to allege former employer violated FRCA’s disclosure obligations where they failed to identify resulting tangible or intangible harm
  • When all federal claims are dismissed, the court ”has the discretion under § 1367(c)(3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.