Peter B. Cooper v. David Goldfarb

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the invention “relates to the fibril length of certain material used for vascular grafts”
• noting that the invention “relates to the fibril length of certain material used for vascular grafts”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. v. W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2012-02-10· cited 29×
• Hitzeman v. Rutter
  Federal Circuit· 2001-03-21· cited 22×
• Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. v. W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2015-01-13· cited 20×
• Nfc Technology, LLC v. Matal
  Federal Circuit· 2017-09-20· cited 14×
• Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. v. W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
  D. Arizona· 2008-07-29· cited 2×
• Airport Surface Technologies, L.L.C. v. FieldTurf, Inc.
  N.D. Illinois· 2003-06-23· cited 1×
• Henkel Corporation v. The Procter & Gamble Company
  Federal Circuit· 2007-05-11
• Unnamed case
  Federal Circuit· 2001-03-21
• AIRPORT SURFACE TECHNOLOGIES v. Fieldturf, Inc.
  N.D. Illinois· 2003-06-23

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Burroughs Wellcome Co. v. Barr Laboratories, Inc., and Novopharm, Inc. And Novopharm, Ltd.
  Federal Circuit· 1994-12-15· cited 241×
• Peter B. Cooper v. David Goldfarb
  Federal Circuit· 1998-09-01· cited 138×
• Knorr v. Pearson
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1982-02-25· cited 46×
• Heard v. Burton
  U.S. Customs Court· 1964-06-25· cited 25×
• Langer v. Kaufman
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1972-09-21· cited 24×
• James L. Gianladis v. Gus S. Kass
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1963-11-14· cited 19×
• Genentech, Inc.,plaintiff-Appellee v. Chiron Corporation,defendant-Appellant
  Federal Circuit· 2000-08-04· cited 9×
• Heard v. Burton
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1964-06-25· cited 7×