Skip to main content
· 9/8/2015

Pete Rodriguez v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • approving, in a case concerning breach of fiduciary duties where the plaintiffs sought money damages and disgorgement, the district court’s decision to hold a jury trial on the damages issue
  • \The availability of an equitable remedy presents a question of law engendering de novo review.\
  • “[Courts] have long recognized the value of limiting instructions. Such instructions, skillfully employed by a district court, often will eliminate – or at least mitigate – a risk of unfair prejudice.” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.