Peta v. Rasmussen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff had concrete First Amendment injury based on allegations that defendant police officers threatened to arrest protestors “if they did not cease their demonstration”
• “hold[ing] that there is a significant 20 government interest in preventing disruptions to classes or substantial order,” even 21 immediately after school
• \consider[ing] declaratory relief\ to be \retrospective to the extent that it is intertwined with a claim for monetary damages that requires us to declare whether a past constitutional violation occurred\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).