Pet Quarters, Inc. v. Depository Trust & Clearing Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “[f]ederal jurisdiction may be found from a complaint if adjudication of a state claim would turn on a federal constitutional or other important federal question, even where only state law issues have been plead
• “Accordingly, any of Pet Quarters’s state law claims that challenge the existence or operation of the program or its rules are federally preempted.”
• affirming dismissal with prejudice for failure to state a claim because amending complaint would be futile
• affirming dismissal with prejudice because the plaintiff did not submit a proposed amended complaint and the record did not indicate what one might have contained
• affirming dismissal with prejudice for failure to state a claim because amending complaint would be futile
• finding no abuse of discretion in concluding amendment would be futile where plaintiff did not indicate how it would make complaint viable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).