Skip to main content
· 1/22/2007

Pestka v. Town of Fort Sheridan Company, LLC

Citations

  • 862 N.E.2d 1044
  • 308 Ill. Dec. 841
  • 371 Ill. App. 3d 286

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where the defendant timely objected to the failure to obtain leave in the circuit court
  • where the defendant timely objected to the failure to obtain leave in the circuit court
  • question still turns on whether the owner so controlled the operative details of the subcontractor’s work so that the subcontractor’s employees were not entirely free to perform the work in their own way
  • general contractor not liable as a matter of law for injury to employee of subcontractor when employee was injured shortly after he began loading I-beams on a trailer and no one from general contractor was present
  • question still turns on whether the owner so controlled the operative details of the subcontractor's work so that the subcontractor's employees were not entirely free to perform the work in their own way
  • “A nunc pro tunc order is an entry now for something that was done on a previous date and is made to make the record speak now for what was actually done then.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McBRIDE

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.