Ninth Circuit· 12/1/2010

Pest Committee v. Miller

Citations

626 F.3d 1097
2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 24554
2010 WL 4869097

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the district court correctly applied the flexible balancing test and “was not obliged to consider whether Nevada’s system could or should be more narrowly tailored”
holding that single-subject requirement for initiative petition was not a direct regulation of core political speech nor did it impose a severe burden on the plaintiffs First Amendment rights
recognizing that avoiding voter confusion is an important state interest
recognizing “that challenges by opponents have tied initiative petitions up in litigation for extended periods of time or that, in some cases, they have left the ° proponents without sufficient time to gather signatures”
upholding Nevada's single-subject rule and noting that no circuit \has ever found a single-subject rule violative of First Amendment rights\
declining to apply Meyer to single-subject and description-of-effect laws because such laws “d[id] not directly affect or even involve one-on-one communication”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alarcón, Rymer, Kennelly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Pest Committee v. Miller

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.