Skip to main content
· 11/24/2010

Pesmel North America, LLC v. Caraustar Industries, Inc.

Citations

  • 754 F. Supp. 2d 168
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124596
  • 2010 WL 4928034

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that “[t]he fact that substantial activities took place in other districts does not preclude a finding that venue is proper in Massachusetts.”
  • finding purposeful availment, in part, because “[t]he contractual relationship between the parties was intended to last for several years”
  • finding Defendant transacted business in Massachusetts where defendant sent payments to Massachusetts and agreement required Plaintiff to use its Massachusetts facility to mobilize parts and labor for out of state Defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gorton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.