· 7/29/1999
Pescia v. Auburn Ford-Lincoln Mercury Inc.
Citations
- 68 F. Supp. 2d 1269
- 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15100
- 1999 WL 787330
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding no evidence that an auto financing company asserts control over a dealer so as to be a principal to the dealer’s agent despite the fact that the financing company dictated the terms of an acceptable assignment and instructed the dealer to achieve a “hard close”
- finding no evidence that an auto financing company asserts control over a dealer so as to be a principal of the dealer despite the fact that the financing company dictated the terms of an acceptable assignment and instructed the dealer to achieve a \hard close\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Carroll
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.