Skip to main content
· 7/18/2007

Pesci v. State

Citations

  • 963 So. 2d 780
  • 2007 WL 2043423

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying the “harmless beyond a reasonable doubt” standard in a proceeding pursuant to the Jimmy Ryce Act
  • applying the \harmless beyond a reasonable doubt\ standard in a proceeding pursuant to the Jimmy Ryce Act
  • applying the “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard to the harmless error test in a Jimmy Ryce Act appeal
  • finding no abuse of discretion in the introduction of police reports wherein the defendant admitted to the psychologists the accuracy of most of the hearsay evidence that was presented and this hearsay evidence was not the sole basis for the defendant’s commitment
  • “A trial court’s ruling on the admissibility of evidence [in a Jimmy Ryce Act trial] will not be disturbed absent a finding that the trial court abused its discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ramirez, Cortiâ—as, and Rothenberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.