· 2/25/2011
PESATURO v. Kinne
Citations
- 20 A.3d 284
- 161 N.H. 550
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- distinguishing between the opportunity to correct deficiencies in original claims and pleading a new cause of action
- following Ivancic v. Olmstead - alleged defect in tree must be readily observable; visible; apparent; patent
- distinguishing between the “opportunity to correct perceived deficiencies in [a plaintiff’s] original claims” pursuant to ERG, and substantive amendments, which “[a] court need only allow . . . when necessary to prevent injustice”
- “[B]efore dismissing a writ for failure to state a cause of action, the trial court must give the plaintiff an opportunity to amend the writ to correct its perceived deficiencies.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dalianis, Duggan, Hicks, Conboy, Lynn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.