Skip to main content
· 2/25/2011

PESATURO v. Kinne

Citations

  • 20 A.3d 284
  • 161 N.H. 550

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • distinguishing between the opportunity to correct deficiencies in original claims and pleading a new cause of action
  • following Ivancic v. Olmstead - alleged defect in tree must be readily observable; visible; apparent; patent
  • distinguishing between the “opportunity to correct perceived deficiencies in [a plaintiff’s] original claims” pursuant to ERG, and substantive amendments, which “[a] court need only allow . . . when necessary to prevent injustice”
  • “[B]efore dismissing a writ for failure to state a cause of action, the trial court must give the plaintiff an opportunity to amend the writ to correct its perceived deficiencies.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dalianis, Duggan, Hicks, Conboy, Lynn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.