Skip to main content
· 3/24/1987

Pesak v. Weitzel (In Re Weitzel)

Citations

  • 72 B.R. 253

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • in Spilman, the court held that where all requirements of collateral estoppel are met, collateral estop-pel should preclude relitigation of factual issues

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Richard L. Speer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.