Skip to main content
· 3/27/1991

Perzik v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance

Citations

  • 228 Cal. App. 3d 1273
  • 279 Cal. Rptr. 498
  • 91 Daily Journal DAR 3667
  • 91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2249
  • 1991 Cal. App. LEXIS 304

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • no duty of medical malpractice insurer to defend in criminal case and grand jury hearing regarding illegal distribution of steroids
  • no duty to defend, under medical malpractice policy, federal grand jury investigation and criminal prosecution
  • \An insurer is not obligated to defend a suit which does not seek the recovery of damages covered by the claimant's policy.\
  • no duty to defend, under medical malpractice policy, federal grand jury investigation and criminal prosecution
  • “An insurer is not obligated to defend a suit which does not seek the recovery of damages covered by the claimant’s policy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Merrill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.