· 3/27/1991
Perzik v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance
Citations
- 228 Cal. App. 3d 1273
- 279 Cal. Rptr. 498
- 91 Daily Journal DAR 3667
- 91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2249
- 1991 Cal. App. LEXIS 304
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- no duty of medical malpractice insurer to defend in criminal case and grand jury hearing regarding illegal distribution of steroids
- no duty to defend, under medical malpractice policy, federal grand jury investigation and criminal prosecution
- \An insurer is not obligated to defend a suit which does not seek the recovery of damages covered by the claimant's policy.\
- no duty to defend, under medical malpractice policy, federal grand jury investigation and criminal prosecution
- “An insurer is not obligated to defend a suit which does not seek the recovery of damages covered by the claimant’s policy.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Merrill
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.