Skip to main content
· 1/14/2010

Peruta v. County of San Diego

Citations

  • 678 F. Supp. 2d 1046
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2831
  • 2010 WL 143762

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that courts may properly take judicial notice of 5 undisputed documents appearing on governmental websites
  • finding that “the Court can properly take judicial notice of the documents appearing on a governmental website” and taking judicial notice of state attorney general handbook located on government agency website
  • finding that “the Court can properly take judicial notice of the documents appearing on a governmental website” and taking judicial notice of state attorney general handbook located on government agency website
  • stating 14 || that courts may properly take judicial notice of undisputed documents appearing on 15 || governmental websites
  • denying 19 motion to dismiss cause of action for violation of Second Amendment
  • “the Court can properly take judi cial notice of the documents appearing on a governmental website”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Irma E. Gonzalez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.