Persson v. Falsen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the defendant’s response to the police when they told him that they planned to show the victim a photo of the defendant corroborated the victim’s identification of the defendant where he stated, “ ‘Of course [the victim] will recognize me. I was there.’ ”
• accepting the trial court’s finding that a “complete description” was provided, which included the suspect’s “race, stature, and hair color”
• driver on highway exposed genitals and masturbated while pulling up alongside car with children
• “When a party objects to evidence as a whole and the trial court rules that the evidence is admissible, the reviewing court will affirm the trial court’s ruling when any part of the evidence is admissible.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).