Skip to main content
· 4/20/1993

Personal Preference Video, Inc. v. Home Box Office, Inc.

Citations

  • 986 F.2d 110
  • 1993 WL 52549

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • interpreting language in the defendant’s contract with a third party that was challenged by the plaintiff, a non-party to the contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reavley, King, Wiener

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.