Person v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 798
Syllabus
Judgment affirmed dismissing complaint under Civ.R. 12(B)(6) because claims were barred by the statute of limitations. Appellant failed to raise the issue of equitable tolling before the Court of Claims and therefore waived it for purposes of appeal. To the extent appellant sought to appeal issues relating to an alternative ground for dismissal or for rejecting his motion for summary judgment, such appeal was moot because the Court of Claims did not reply on the alternative ground and did not rule on the motion for summary judgment.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a sentencing court properly used a starting date preceding that charged in the indictment to determine the start of a criminal history look- back period
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dorrian
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.