Skip to main content
· 3/26/1866

Person & Drissell v. Neigh

Citations

  • 52 Pa. 199
  • 1866 Pa. LEXIS 84

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • describing equitable recoupment as “a creature of the federal judiciary” but concluding same transaction requirement not met

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Agnew

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.