Skip to main content

Perry v. State

Citations

  • 921 N.E.2d 525
  • 2010 Ind. App. LEXIS 237
  • 2010 WL 565420

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in ordering aggregate sentences to run consecutive to previously imposed terms of incarceration
  • concluding that defendant waived Appellate Rule 7(B) issue by failing to make a cogent argument as to why his sentence was inappropriate given the nature of the offense and the character of the offender
  • noting that “[i]t is well-established that a failure to make a cogent argument regarding the nature of the defendant’s character results in waiver of the defendant’s appropriateness claim”
  • noting that “it is well-established that a failure to make a cogent argument regarding the nature of the defendant’s offense and the defendant’s character results in waiver of the defendant’s appropriateness claim”
  • failure to make cogent argument regarding the nature of defendant’s offense and defendant’s character results in waiver of appropriateness claim
  • “It is well-established that a failure to make a cogent argument regarding the nature of the defendant’s offense and the defendant’s character results in waiver of the defendant’s appropriateness claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bradford, Najam, Friedlander

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.