Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 11/13/1997
Perry v. State
Citations
- 957 S.W.2d 894
- 1997 Tex. App. LEXIS 5928
- 1997 WL 703412
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- error was waived where defendant did not object to testimony elicited during the State's direct examination until defendant completed cross examination
- “Although Perry objected to the admission of the calculation summary report when it was offered by the State, he did not object when the witness testified about the contents of the report. Thus, he did not preserve error.”
- “Although Perry objected to the admission of the calculation summary report when it was offered by the State, he did not object when the witness testified about the contents of the report. Thus, he did not preserve error.”
- “Although Perry objected to the admission of the calculation summary report when it was offered by the State, he did not object when the witness testified about the contents of the report. Thus, he did not preserve error.”
- “Although Perry objected to the admission of the calculation summary report when it was offered by the State, he did not object when the witness testified about the contents of the report. Thus, he did not preserve error.”
- “Although Perry objected to the admission of the calculation summary report when it was offered by the State, he did not object when the witness testified about the contents of the report. Thus, he did not preserve error.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cornelius, Grant, Ross
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Demarkous Clay v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2012-02-16· cited 95×
- Hoxie Implement Co., Inc. v. BakerTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2001-10-23· cited 86×
- Robert Cruz Lozano v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2012-01-26· cited 77×
- Texas Department of Public Safety v. CaruanaTexas Supreme Court· 2012-03-30· cited 34×
- McRae v. EcholsTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2000-01-12· cited 33×
- Fischer v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2006-10-31· cited 29×
- Thomas v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2007-05-17· cited 26×
- Martin Suarez Juarez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2015-03-24· cited 15×
- Belle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2018-02-22· cited 14×
- Mohammed Haq v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2013-05-07· cited 10×
- Alaa Mohamad Weiss v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2009-12-10
- Tawana K. Burgess v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1999-02-19
- Ramon Moreno v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1998-11-25
- Hoxie Implement Company, Inc. v. Jim Baker, Individually and Dba Baker HarvestingTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2001-09-21
- Hoxie Implement Company, Inc. v. Jim Baker, Individually and Dba Baker HarvestingTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2001-06-13
- Cindy Hill v. Lubbock National BankTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2002-10-15
- Estella Rodriguez v. Donald C. Frietag, M.D.Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2003-10-10
- Kathryn Forkert v. StateTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2007-09-13
- in Re Commitment of James GrinsteadTex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2009-01-15
- Gregory McCowen v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2003-08-29
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.