Perry v. Perry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ‘‘[b]ecause [t]he construction of [an order or] judgment is a question of law for the court . . . our review . . . is plenary’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Coleman v. Bembridge
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2021-08-31· cited 12×
• Patnode v. Urette
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2014-05-02· cited 6×
• Hogan v. Lagosz
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2013-12-31· cited 5×
• Perry v. Perry
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2014-07-22
• Greenan v. Greenan
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2014-05-20
• Tannenbaum v. Tannenbaum
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2021-09-28

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Mickey v. Mickey
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-07-21· cited 56×
• Berglass v. Berglass
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2002-08-27· cited 42×
• Holcombe v. Holcombe
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1990-07-17· cited 38×
• In re Haley B.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-02-18· cited 27×
• Bauer v. Bauer
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2011-07-12· cited 5×
• Perugini v. Devino
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2008-12-02· cited 4×