· 7/16/1999
Perry v. Medical Practice Board
Citations
- 737 A.2d 900
- 169 Vt. 399
- 1999 Vt. LEXIS 211
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that some legislative enactments are intended “to clarify rather than change existing law”
- medical board’s discretion to deny request for withdrawal of application “falls well within the necessary and implied powers of its express statutory mandate”
- in determining legislative intent, court must look to words of statute, legislative history and circumstances surrounding statute’s enactment, and legislative policy that statute was designed to implement
- failure to raise issue by cross-appeal divests this Court of jurisdiction
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dooley, Morse, Johnson, Skoglund, Gibson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.