Skip to main content
· 7/16/1999

Perry v. Medical Practice Board

Citations

  • 737 A.2d 900
  • 169 Vt. 399
  • 1999 Vt. LEXIS 211

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that some legislative enactments are intended “to clarify rather than change existing law”
  • medical board’s discretion to deny request for withdrawal of application “falls well within the necessary and implied powers of its express statutory mandate”
  • in determining legislative intent, court must look to words of statute, legislative history and circumstances surrounding statute’s enactment, and legislative policy that statute was designed to implement
  • failure to raise issue by cross-appeal divests this Court of jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dooley, Morse, Johnson, Skoglund, Gibson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.