Perry v. Medeiros

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that in a negligence case, the testimony of the building inspector interpreting the building code and opining that it had been violated was properly excluded
• requiring notice of a claim under G. L. c. 84, § 18, in “snow and ice” cases to be given within thirty days of an accident
• affirming trial judge’s exclusion of testimony from building inspector that building code was violated as it was “function of the jury to decide whether there was a violation of the code” based upon evidence in the record
• flight of exterior stairs used by occupants of several apartments in same building characterized as common area
• flight of exterior stairs used by occupants of several apartments in same building characterized as “common stairway”
• failure to install handrail raised genuine issue of material fact as to whether defendant was negligent in maintenance of premises

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).