Perry v. Fiumano
Citations
- 61 A.D.2d 512
- 403 N.Y.S.2d 382
- 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9768
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he rule of privilege protecting such communications must yield to the ‘dominant ... duty of the court to guard the welfare of its wards.’ ” (quoting Bachman v. Mejias, 1 N.Y.2d 575, 154 N.Y.S.2d 903, 136 N.E.2d 866, 869 (1956))
- \Wigmore's test surely has relevance in a custody proceeding\
- “Wigmore’s test surely has relevance in a custody proceeding”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dillon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Kinsella v. KinsellaSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1997-07-10· cited 173×
- In the Interest of A.M., Minor Child. Heather Thomas, Subpoenaed WitnessSupreme Court of Iowa· 2014-11-21· cited 81×
- Anker v. BrodnitzNew York Supreme Court· 1979-02-07· cited 50×
- People v. FitzgeraldNew York County Courts· 1979-11-14· cited 48×
- Commonwealth v. CollettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1982-09-20· cited 46×
- Matter of Von GoytCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1984-11-14· cited 44×
- Matter of Adoption of EmbickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-03-20· cited 32×
- Bieluch v. BieluchSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-08-02· cited 24×
- In re Michelet P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1979-08-20· cited 21×
- Weisbeck v. HessSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1994-11-09· cited 20×
- McDonald v. McDonaldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1994-02-22· cited 20×
- People ex rel. Hickox v. HickoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1978-11-14· cited 17×
- In re D.D.S.Alaska Supreme Court· 1994-03-04· cited 14×
- Humberstone v. WheatonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2005-09-30· cited 12×
- State v. MastracciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1980-12-12· cited 12×
- Carstens v. CarstensAlaska Supreme Court· 1994-02-11· cited 9×
- Jenkins v. MartinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1984-02-21· cited 9×
- In re Mary S.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1992-04-30· cited 8×
- People v. LipskyNew York County Courts· 1979-12-10· cited 6×
- In re Dwayne G.NYC Family Court· 1978-12-11· cited 6×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Koump v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals· 1969-07-02· cited 319×
- Bachman v. MejiasNew York Court of Appeals· 1956-07-11· cited 65×
- Kesseler v. KesselerNew York Court of Appeals· 1962-01-11· cited 65×
- People v. DoeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1978-03-01· cited 55×
- Mulligan v. StateNew York Court of Appeals· 1951-07-11· cited 30×
- In re the Investigation into Alleged Commission of Criminal AbortionsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1955-06-30· cited 25×
- Schulman v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.New York Court of Appeals· 1975-12-04· cited 24×
- In re KlugAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1969-07-15· cited 20×
- Baecher v. BaecherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1977-07-11· cited 19×
- People ex rel. Chitty v. FitzgeraldNew York Supreme Court· 1963-11-06· cited 19×
- Johnson v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1966-03-21· cited 15×
- In re ClearNYC Family Court· 1969-01-02· cited 15×
- Yaron v. YaronNew York Supreme Court· 1975-09-08· cited 12×
- People v. BrooksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1975-12-22· cited 10×
- Community Service Society v. Welfare Inspector GeneralNew York Supreme Court· 1977-08-17· cited 9×
- Schulman v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1974-05-28· cited 8×
- Do Vidio v. Do VidioNYC Family Court· 1968-02-21· cited 6×
- People v. BrooksNew York Court of Appeals· 1977-06-09· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.