Perry v. Cohen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that appellants did not need to assign a separate issue or point to challenge both order granting special exceptions and final dismissal based on same special exceptions
• holding that appellants were “entitled” to appellate review of an issue that was argued in the body of appellants’ brief but was not included in appellants’ list of “Issues Presented”
• holding that appellants were “entitled” to appellate review of an issue that was argued in the body of appellants’ brief but was not included in appellants’ list of “Issues Presented”
• holding that court of appeals erred by concluding appellant failed to assign error and by failing to liberally construe the issues presented and the subsidiary questions fairly included therein in light of the assertions by appellant in the argument section of the brief
• holding that court of appeals erred by concluding appellant failed to assign error and by failing to liberally construe the issues presented and the subsidiary questions fairly included therein in light of the assertions by appellant in the argument section of the brief
• noting that the statement of an issue includes every subsidiary question that is fairly included

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).