Veterans Claims· 2/22/1996

Perry v. Brown

Citations

9 Vet. App. 2
1996 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 77
1996 WL 78386

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that on remand the Board could develop a ease itself through use of a VA medical expert opinion
stating that on remand the Board could develop a case itself through use of a VA medical expert opinion
stating that, in event that medical-nexus opinion was needed on remand, “Board may seek to obtain that development itself through a[VA] or non-VA [medical expert] opinion”
stating that, in event that medical-nexus opinion was needed on remand, \Board may seek to obtain that development itself through a [VA] or non-VA [medical expert] opinion\
“The Board may seek to obtain [a medical opinion] itself through a VA Veterans Health Administration or non-VA IME opinion, or through a remand to the RO for it to obtain an IME opinion, or to provide for a VA examination of the veteran.” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Farley, Holdaway, Steinberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.