Perry v. Berkley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the motion to exclude the expert’s opinion “doesn’t focus on qualifications or competence or methodology or the science involved, it focuses on the factual foundation”
• noting cross-examination rather than exclusion can be the proper method of exploring the bases of an expert’s opinion and the weight to be ascribed thereto
• noting cross-examination rather than exclusion can be the proper method of examining the bases of an expert’s opinion and the weight to be ascribed thereto
• noting cross-examination rather than exclusion can be the proper method of exploring the bases of an expert’s opinion and the weight to be ascribed thereto
• noting cross-examination rather than exclusion can be the proper method of exploring the bases of an expert’s opinion and the weight to be ascribed thereto
• noting cross-examination rather than exclusion can be the proper method of exploring the bases of an expert’s opinion and the weight to be ascribed thereto

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).