Skip to main content
· 5/1/1995

Perrotti v. Solomon

Citations

  • 657 A.2d 1045
  • 1995 R.I. LEXIS 123
  • 1995 WL 257141

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the enabling legislation for the state's retirement board was \sufficiently broad so as to include the retirement board's administrative authority to determine pension eligibility\ even when that authority was not specifically mentioned in the statute
  • holding that the enabling legislation for the state’s retirement board was “sufficiently broad so as to include the retirement board’s administrative authority to determine pension eligibility” even when that authority was not specifically mentioned in the statute
  • holding that the state retirement board's enabling legislation, which endowed the board with the authority to \administer\ and \operate\ the retirement system, provided \sufficiently broad\ authority to decide matters not explicitly provided for elsewhere in the statute
  • obligating retirement board to convene to reconsider applicant's pension pursuant to inherent authority
  • retirement board could reconsider its decision as it was unaware of a previous federal mail fraud conviction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murray

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.