Perritt v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “it was of interest for the jury to know” why defendant was not arrested until two months after the offense
• police officer testimony regarding investigative procedures employed in the case was admissible because jury was entitled to know the circumstances culminating in courtroom identification
• police officer testimony regarding investigative procedures employed in the case was admissible because jury was entitled to know the circumstances culminating in courtroom identification

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).