· 11/6/2015
Perriott, Ron AKA Ronald Kevin Perriott
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding “the district court properly exercised its discretion by concluding that [expert] testimony did not fit the facts of [the] case.”
- affirming exclusion of a causation expert who gave an “opinion about a hypothetical high-risk patient using” the medication at issue at certain doses, when the plaintiff took lower doses
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.