Skip to main content
· 11/6/2015

Perriott, Ron AKA Ronald Kevin Perriott

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding “the district court properly exercised its discretion by concluding that [expert] testimony did not fit the facts of [the] case.”
  • affirming exclusion of a causation expert who gave an “opinion about a hypothetical high-risk patient using” the medication at issue at certain doses, when the plaintiff took lower doses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.