Skip to main content
· 11/30/1896

Perrine v. Slack

Citations

  • 164 U.S. 452
  • 17 S. Ct. 79
  • 41 L. Ed. 510
  • 1896 U.S. LEXIS 1881

Syllabus

<p>The controversy in this case being between the mother and the testamentary guardian of infant children, each claiming the right to their custody and care, the matter in dispute is of such a nature as to be incapable of being reduced to any pecuniary standard of value; and for this, and for the reasons given in Chapman v. United States, ante, 436, it is held that this court has no jurisdiction to review judgments of the Court of Appeals under such circumstances.</p> <p>The court aiso declines to pass upon the question whether the action of the • Court of Appeals, after the writ of error had been granted, was or was not improvident.</p>

Judges: Fuller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.