Perrin v. Whipple

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the “mere presence of chemicals, even above background levels,” did not establish endangerment “without evidence of an exposure pathway”
• “evidentiary rules are relaxed at the preliminary injunction stage.”
• weighing of factors “not mathematical in 13 nature”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).