Perrigo Research & Development Company v. United States Food and Drug Administration

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that mandamus is only appropriate “for really extraordinary causes”
• “To ensure that standing is not dispensed in gross, the district court must analyze Plaintiffs’ standing to challenge each provision of law at issue.”
• “A district court’s obligation to consider a challenge to its jurisdiction is non-discretionary.”
• “A district court’s obligation to consider a challenge to its jurisdiction is non-discretionary.”
• noting the federal courts’ independent obligation to assess standing
• “Article III requires more than theoretical possibilities.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).